Then Pilate entered the headquarters
again, summoned Jesus, and asked Him, “Are You the King of the Jews?” Jesus
answered, “Do you ask this on your own, or did others tell you about Me?” (John
18.33-34)
Empire, Supremacy, and Legitimate Rule
This weekend, churches worldwide mark the end of the
liturgical year with the feast of Christ the King (also known as “The Reign of
Christ”). The official line on its origin holds that Pope Pius XI instituted
the feast in 1925 to offset growing secularism among the Faithful, to remind
them that Christ is the Sovereign Ruler and Lord of all. But numerous
historians have suggested the feast was also born of political expediency.
World War One effectively unraveled the last of Europe’s dynastic empires, in
one case contributing to the overthrow of a monarch (Russia) and in others (Great
Britain, Austro-Hungary, and Germany) reducing royal figures to ceremonial
heads of state. As “anointed” rulers of vast lands, they had governed at the behest
of their spiritual overseers. This paradigm would be no more. In addition to
splintering the Continent into smaller, autonomous nations, the War augured the
ascendance of a new world leader, the United States. Although Americans were
far less consumed by secularism than their French cousins, both countries passionately
upheld the separation of Church and State. There was no mistaking they signaled a wave of the future that would strip Catholic and Protestant prelates
of power they’d exercised for centuries.
Pius XI’s declaration of Christ’s sovereignty over all
nations and peoples was an easy purchase for Protestant bishops who typically
ignored Vatican edicts. Few questioned its theological urgency. Rapid
shifts in thought had thrown the balance of religion and politics off-kilter.
Christianity’s role as Western civilization’s voice of justice and compassion
was failing; God’s kingdom was losing ground. As so often has happened in Church
history, there was more to the Feast of Christ the King than met the eye: the
assertion of Christ’s Lordship doubled as reassertion of ecclesiastical
influence. And its tension between religious and political power is
instructive, since the same issues—empire, supremacy, and legitimate rule—bubble
up in Sunday’s Gospel. (John 18.33-17) This time, however, belief threatens politics. A new wave of thought is taking hold,
one that insists a Higher Authority trumps the power structure cobbled together
by an uneasy alliance between Rome and Judaism. A new kingdom—mysteriously described
as “not of this world”—is on the rise. And its Herald, the renegade Rabbi,
Jesus of Nazareth, is called to account for allegedly treasonous ideology that
could (and ultimately does) overturn the status quo.
Pilate on Trial
Familiarity with the scene—Pilate’s interrogation of
Jesus—offers no help with deciphering its riddles. The bluntness of their
exchange is deceptive, as each man harbors doubts about about the other’s
legitimacy. Jesus is charged with heresy, a matter of no concern to Rome beyond
its potential to destabilize the fragile balance of power the Empire has struck
with the Temple establishment. Yet the high priests are reluctant to rule against
Jesus, fearing a populist backlash that would demonstrate they’ve lost control
of their people and render them useless to Rome. With acute cunning, they shift
the burden to Pilate, accusing Jesus of professing to be King of the Jews,
which qualifies Him as an insurgent worthy of death at Roman hands.
When Jesus stands before him, Pilate doesn't mince words. “Are you the King of the Jews?” he asks, to which Jesus
responds, “Do you ask this on your own, or did others tell you about Me?”
(v33-34) With that, the tables turn. Jesus puts Pilate on trial. Has the Roman
summoned Him because he wonders if Jesus is indeed the King of the Jews? (This
possibility isn’t lost on either of them, since Pilate’s boss is also a
self-avowed divine monarch.) Or is this merely a pro forma hearing to get
to the bottom of baseless gossip? Neither option pleases Pilate. Genuine
curiosity about Jesus’s identity would belie his faith in Caesar; investigating
religious rumors would make him a puppet of the Temple elite. So Pilate deftly
distances himself from the situation, admitting, “I’m not a Jew. I shouldn’t be
expected to understand this stuff.”
The deflection opens the door for Jesus to assert divine
authority. “My kingdom is not from this world,” He says. With daring sarcasm
that brings a smile to the alert reader’s face, Jesus validates His otherworldly
claim: “If my kingdom were from this world, My followers would be fighting to
keep Me from being handed over to the Jews.” (v36) Since this obviously isn’t
happening, the argument makes sense to Pilate. Still, its elusive nature
doesn’t settle the matter. “So are you a king?” he asks again, dropping the
Jewish reference. Jesus replies, “You
say I am a king. For this I was born, and for this I came into the world to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice.” (v37; emphasis
added)
Power to Seek the Truth
The Feast of Christ the King invites us to witness the truth of Christ’s Lordship—to embrace faith
in a divine kingdom that supersedes human authority. Yet accepting this belief
cannot happen by taking prelates and pastors’ word for it. We can only discover
the truth by listening to Christ’s voice. And I’m persuaded this
realization springs from the first question Jesus puts to Pilate: “Do you ask
this on your own, or did others tell you about Me?”
Our confidence that Christ reigns supreme begins with
profoundly personal questions about Who Jesus really is—and how much real power we’re willing to cede to His
Lordship. As it was in Pilate’s court, so it is in our lives. Faith in Christ’s
kingdom demands humility born of understanding its mysteries can never be fully
understood. It’s impossible to equate Christ’s sovereign rule with earthly
powers, as the kingdom of God seeks no earthly power; it summons authority by
granting us power to seek the truth of
Who God and Jesus really are, who we really
are, and the roles we play in a kingdom unlike any ever known. Pilate’s
small-mindedness is exposed in his dismissal of Jesus’s challenge. He wants an
admission of power that has nothing to do with the truth of Christ’s kingdom.
Clearly, he’s not listening. And we benefit from his deafness, because it opens
our minds to recognize the truth of Christ’s Lordship can never be told. To
experience its majesty, it must be heard.
Amid all the regal adjectives tossed around in this weekend’s liturgies, hymns,
and sermons, I trust we’ll hear the voice of Jesus. Do you ask this on your
own, or did others tell you about Me?
Seen through the prism
of Pilate’s interrogation, the truth of Christ’s Lordship emerges as thing that
cannot be told. It must be heard to be understood.
No comments:
Post a Comment